FreeBSD vs. Win2k
[34 byte] By [Zach Thompson] at [2007-11-9 23:52:25] 
what's more secure all around
# 1 Re: FreeBSD vs. Win2k
It's not correct question.Because each OS has special security features.
It's depend on tasks that you want to secure, administrator skills,
required standards and so on. You should specify area in which you want
to get maximum security level for different software platforms.
Nikolay Stanchenko,
Brainbench MVP in Internet Security
www.brainbench.com
Nikolay Stanchenko at 2007-11-12 0:14:40 >
# 2 Re: FreeBSD vs. Win2k
With equally competent administrators, BSD is more secure, and morestable. It's also slightly harder to use, though, so you need to know
what you're doing to configure it properly. (I guess the same holds
true for Windows, though.)
Zach Thompson wrote:
> what's more secure all around
Chris Biltcliffe at 2007-11-12 0:15:37 >
