Protect Software

Hello ,

I dont think the crackers will be stucked on any tool , they crack Microsoft product , how about your software.

but anyway EXECryptor is too much good againts Beginner crackers !

About execryptor I found this one:

>> Here some links:

>> http://www.xheo.com/
>> http://www.aspack.com/asprotect.html
>> http://www.siliconrealms.com/armadillo_engine.shtml
>> http://www.smartassembly.com
>> http://www.eziriz.com
>> http://www.strongbit.com/

> I tried more than listed below protections. The strongest most
> proof most flexible from this list is really EXECryptor form
> http://www.strongbit.com/. It is not only the mine opinion. Most
> software vendors agree > with me. The only thing I cannot
> understand is the absence of reviews of EXECryptor in developer
> press, nor > blogs/white papers. However it has very good opinions
> in different programmer's disscussion. I can assume > it is one
> one things that "its quality sells itself". The other "cons" is
> EXECryptor does not support .NET platform working only for win32
> exe's; dll's and othe PE's and only Windows compatible. However for
> cross-> platform apps licensing there is HardKey License Manager
> (as well from strogbit.com ). It has less 'bullet-
> proof' antireverse/anticrack but more advanced and flexible
> licensing features (however remains unbroken as well as
> EXECryptor). So if smb. really needs to solve cracks/piracy
> problem StrongBit really will DO. By the way as for .NET
> protection (the original thread subject) Strongbit partners with
> dotnet protector author 9Rays and they follozing their press
> release they are planning to create universal app security. I'm
> sure it is the only one protection that warrant attention of people
> looking for commercial program anticrack security tools.

> Regards
> Mad
> EXECryptor user

As for me I'm trying execryptor now... What I can say... Another vote for it

Also there is hot discussion generally about piracy and protection on http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?design.4.354142.23

Hey ; glade to see u talking about this :)

Just I wanna explain something ; protecting your app by any way you guess it's hard, will not make any protection at all !!

Okey many programmes makes a protector to protect your app , but it generally protect your resource or your app from commonly knowen attck methods ; but finally they can't protect it from processing !!!

What I mean is your application must finally after all -what u call it protection- be transformed into assembly to be passed to the proccessor , and if the proccessor can proceess it so by many finitly steps u can also !
I agree it differs from a cracker to another to have fastest result but finally results exists !

can u understand what I mean ??

***Up to now I haven't found any software that can't be cracked === If u nderstand what I said u can prove that no software can't be cracked :o .

This is a question that gets repeated over and over our forums.

The answer is: if it can run, it can be cracked. A protector is as hard as you are capable of integrating and implementing its additional features.

Few good protectors:

ExeCryptor
ASProtect
Armadillo (but now nico's is out the arma gang, stay away as ****...)
TheMida
SVKP

mmh... what other?

Oh, make always crippled demo. Out of curiosity, I have rest the trial of one of the above in less than 5 minutes.

Ah, don't code it by yourself. Please. It would be really an idiot thing to do.

it is really a good idea but it is hard to realize it.